The
present Guemes Ferry (with a similar weekday schedule) was put in service
in the late 1970’s. Since that time, recreational activities all
over western Washington have expanded at an increasing rate. Guemes Island
is no exception to this growth with large increases in the base population,
and in summer visitors. At this same time, the availability of evening
activities and work opportunities in the Anacortes/Burlington/ Mt. Vernon
area has increased even more rapidly. The present schedule does not provide
for residents to take part in evening church, school, and/or community
activities that occur off Island.
Some find it easy
to believe that the present 25 year old schedule will restrain growth.
From observation, it hasn’t been very effective in the past, and
with the continued growth of the surrounding population base, I do not
expect it to be an effective (or proper) tool in the future.
Skagit County has provided a large capital investment for the Ferry System
in the last few years. The new fare structure that has just been put in
operation has caused reactions that hide the fact that without some basic
extension of the schedule, the ferry will not meet the growing traffic
needs. Neither the past year with long periods with passenger launch service,
nor this year with the large change in fares for most Islanders, can provide
a base to compare realistic operations. During most of 2003 and 2004 there
were extended lines that filled ferries from 7 am until the third 11 am
run and again in the evening hours with an almost automatic second and
sometimes third 6 pm run. As the ferry operations returns to more normal
duty, and the higher fares are digested, these conditions will return—with
the added population base to exert even more demands on the system. Added
runs will provide more spaces per day and be helpful in spreading this
demand.
An early study done
by Skagit County (Berk & Associates-2002) indicated that some 47%
of those that participated would like additional evening ferry service
during the weekday period. The evening schedule during the week has been
proposed and should be granted an adequate test.
Jim O’Neil
Candidate for Ferry Committee 2002 and 2004 |
Advisory
Ballot Position Paper -- 1/25/06
How tantalizing to imagine the added convenience of later ferry runs,
how much more difficult to weigh the costs, to the quality of life on
Guemes and our pocketbooks.
Extending the weekday
ferry hours will have a profound effect on the character of Guemes and
its limited water resources. Ferry runs to 10 o’clock will allow
Guemes to become a bedroom community, changing the rural character of
island life. Imagine suburban housing density and the accompanying issues
of suburban life on Guemes as ferry access no longer limits the daily
commute to work. Imagine the strain this development would place on our
aquifer. New wells would more rapidly drain existing water resources,
increasing the risk of saltwater intrusion.
The proposed ferry
schedule expansion also has real financial costs, and Guemes Islanders
will likely be the ones who will pay for the development of their island.
For over two decades Skagit County ran the ferry at close to a break-even
budget, averaging less than $300,000 in annual shortfall. Losses have
ballooned up to over $1 million annually through questionable management
practices, a lack of capital project planning, and increased crew size.
Projects have run over budget. The most recent two-month haul-out, planned
to last one month and cost $800,000, cost nearly $1.3 million. Total ferry
losses in 2005 approached $2 million
Skagit County’s
response to increased ferry costs was to more than double the frequent
user fares. We can expect them to look to the fares again to make up other
losses.
Public Works own cost
estimate for added evening hours is $300,000 more per year, but this only
includes crew costs for the added time. Not included are estimates of
added ferry wear and tear. Nor has the County figured that the ferry will
be tallying more engine time during the day as the island commuter population
swells. How does the County get even another $300,000 in revenue? Ferry
fares would have to be doubled again, and the County would still be short.
Is suburban “convenience”
worth another surcharge to our fares and the loss of our rural island
character?
Friends of Guemes
Island
Gary Davis, President
Robert Easton, Treasurer
David Wertheimer, Secretary
|
The character of Guemes
has changed drastically in the past 30 years. The ferry operation—little
changed in this period—has not been a factor. Future growth is limited
by our rural (R10) designation not by ferry operations.
Poor ferry management can not be excused, but it is no reason have poor
service. Past estimates of the added costs of late ferries have been “almost
nothing” from a previous County Public Works Director, to a 2005
analysis that showed that total crew and operating costs would be about
$100,000. The County estimate has no basis that is understandable. A fifteen-
percent increase in operating hours should not result in a fifty- percent
increase in costs.
A trial operation
long enough to allow people to plan to take evening programs, or volunteer
for activities off Island is necessary to determine if service is viable
and supportable. Let’s give it a try…
Jim O’Neil,
Candidate for Ferry Committee 2002 and 2004 |
Do
islanders support expansion of operations that will escalate the urbanization
of Guemes, increasing traffic, construction and taxing our aquifer? What
about the impact on our 6th Street Anacortes neighbors? Will late hours
increase the risk of crime and vandalism for an island without police?
Are islanders willing to dig deeper in their pockets to pay for extended
hours? The costs will be substantial and the county is clear that riders
will pay most of these costs. The Berk survey of 2002 was unscientific;
anyone could respond as often as they liked. Ferry Committee elections
results over the past several years suggest a strong island consensus
to maintain current ferry hours; this ballot will be the first careful
survey of island voters. Finally, given the labor and union issues involved,
does anyone really believe the County would be able to undertake extended
hours for only a “test” period?
Friends of Guemes
Island
Gary Davis, President
Robert Easton, Treasurer
David Wertheimer, Secretary
|